SecurityTracker.com
Keep Track of the Latest Vulnerabilities
with SecurityTracker!
    Home    |    View Topics    |    Search    |    Contact Us    |   

SecurityTracker
Archives


 
Sign Up
Sign Up for Your FREE Weekly SecurityTracker E-mail Alert Summary
Instant Alerts
Buy our Premium Vulnerability Notification Service to receive customized, instant alerts
Affiliates
Put SecurityTracker Vulnerability Alerts on Your Web Site -- It's Free!
Partners
Become a Partner and License Our Database or Notification Service
Report a Bug
Report a vulnerability that you have found to SecurityTracker
bugs
@
securitytracker.com






Category:   Application (File Transfer/Sharing)  >   Cerberus FTP Server Vendors:   Averett, Grant
Re: Cerberus FTP Server Can Be Crashed by Remote Users
SecurityTracker Alert ID:  1001938
SecurityTracker URL:  http://securitytracker.com/id/1001938
CVE Reference:   GENERIC-MAP-NOMATCH   (Links to External Site)
Date:  Jul 6 2001
Impact:   Denial of service via network

Version(s): 1.x (1.2 and 1.5 were tested)
Description:   A vulnerability was reported in the Cerberus FTP Server that lets remote users crash the service.

A user notes that Cerberus FTPd contains several other buffer overflows, including PASS <long>, and PASV\n x (lots).

For details on the original vulnerability report, see the Message History.

Impact:   A remote user can cause the FTP server to crash.
Solution:   No solution was available at the time of this entry.
Vendor URL:  www.greenepa.net/~averett/ (Links to External Site)
Cause:   Boundary error
Underlying OS:  

Message History:   This archive entry is a follow-up to the message listed below.
Jun 22 2001 Cerberus FTP Server Can Be Crashed by Remote Users



 Source Message Contents

Date:  Wed, 4 Jul 2001 10:48:46 +0200
Subject:  CesarFTPd, Cerberus FTPd


Hi all,

Long arguments for USER, PASS, PORT, DELE, REST, RMD, and MKD (perhaps
others as well) sent to CesarFTPd (www.aclogic.com) will cause a stack
overflow. I e-mailed the vendor almost 2 weeks ago and have recieved no
response. :-/ Cerberus FTPd (mentioned in some-one's BugTraq post earlier -
I forget who), has a couple of other overflows which weren't mentioned (PASS
<long>, PASV\n x (lots), etc) and this vendor is also irresponsive.

It seems that developers who make free software for the Win32 platform tend
to believe that because their product is free, they don't have to maintain
it at all, nor release source so that other people can. :-/

Anyway, these two daemons should be considered insecure - don't run them.

Cheers,
Andrew Lewis
--
wizdumb at leet dot org
http://www.mdma.za.net/fk


 
 


Go to the Top of This SecurityTracker Archive Page





Home   |    View Topics   |    Search   |    Contact Us

Copyright 2013, SecurityGlobal.net LLC